MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409647190 · doi:10.23977/jemm.2025.100109

Research on Optimization of Cutting Force of TC4 Titanium Alloy Based on Support Vector Machine

2025· article· en· W4409647190 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and Machinery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTitanium alloyAlloyMaterials scienceSupport vector machineTitaniumMechanical engineeringComputer scienceMetallurgyEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Titanium alloy TC4 has excellent mechanical properties and corrosion resistance, and is widely used in aerospace, medical devices and other fields. However, its difficult machinability leads to large cutting forces and severe tool wear. Its inherent low thermal conductivity, low elastic modulus and work hardening characteristics easily cause problems such as cutting overheating and poor surface machining quality during the cutting process, affecting processing efficiency and quality. Based on support vector machine (SVM) technology and through orthogonal experimental design, this paper selects appropriate design parameter sample points to design a prediction model, builds a cutting force prediction model for TC4 titanium alloy, and optimizes the cutting parameters. The research results show that the SVM model can effectively predict cutting force, and the optimized cutting parameters significantly reduce cutting force and improve processing efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and MachinerySame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207