MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409649474 · doi:10.3390/curroncol32040242

Glioblastoma in NF1: A Unique Entity—A Literature Review Focusing on Surgical Implication and Our Experience

2025· review· en· W4409649474 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elisa Garbin, Lorenzo Nicolè, Salima Magrini, Yuri Ceccaroni, Luca Denaro, Luca Basaldella, Marta Rossetto

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversità degli Studi di Padova
KeywordsMedicineGlioblastomaPathologicalOverall survivalPopulationOncologySurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma in patients affected by NF1 germline mutation (NF1-associated GBM) represents a unique heterogeneous clinical and pathological entity. We have reviewed the few cases reported in the literature and they seem to have a better response to standard therapy and overall survival than GBM in the non-NF1 population. We present two cases of long-survival NF1 patients with GBM. Case 1 was a 38-year-old woman with cerebellar GBM who underwent surgical asportation and the Stupp protocol many times with an overall survival of 117 months. Case 2 was a 47-year-old woman with GBM in the eloquent area of the right frontal lobe; she underwent surgical asportation and the Stupp protocol with an overall survival of 25 months. The data analysis demonstrates that NF1-associated GBM patients could be considered long-term survivors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Oncology→Same topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases→French-language works237,207→