MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409651786 · doi:10.1080/17475759.2025.2495982

Integrating Canadian Newcomers into Hybrid Workplaces: Employers’ Views on Hiring and Onboarding

2025· article· en· W4409651786 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Masoud Kianpour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intercultural Communication Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersImmigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
KeywordsOnboardingBusinessWorkplace safetyPublic relationsComputer sciencePsychologyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyLawOccupational safety and health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores perceptions of Canadian employers with regard to the workplace integration of immigrant newcomers during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on “soft skills” and “Canadian experience” as two aspects of Canadian workplace culture. Based on focus group interviews with 25 employers, the study identifies challenges newcomers face in hybrid workplaces that demand a combination of digital and soft skills. Employers consider the development of soft skills and cultural competency to be essential for successful integration. However, cultural humility and intelligence may better support newcomers. Future research should further explore the complexities of intercultural communication in hybrid workplaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intercultural Communication ResearchSame topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207