Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article demonstrates that, notwithstanding Ireland's 1949 Commonwealth secession, it (re)established an informal external association with this grouping's principal concrete concerns, which remained quite extensive, that lasted throughout the 1950s. By law or practice, 1950s Ireland lifted alien restrictions on most Commonwealth citizens and its citizens received preferential treatment in most Commonwealth countries. It participated in the Commonwealth tariff ‘system' by both giving and receiving preferences based on ‘Commonwealth' status and by maintaining long-standing trade agreements with the UK, Canada and South Africa. As with all the Commonwealth bar Canada, it remained within the Sterling Area which greatly bolstered economic links. Ireland also participated in several lower-level Commonwealth fora and its ‘special position' was said to strikingly illustrate the Commonwealth's capacity to adjust. However, it took no part in high-level political consultation and, even in functional areas (with the singular exception of agricultural research), lacked privileges to exercise leadership or even clear rights. These limitations bolstered interest in rejoining especially in the late 1950s. However, allied to a background a recognition that the Commonwealth was becoming less central to concrete links including in the crucial UK context, this was rendered politically impossible by the unresolved issue of Partition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".