MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409661418 · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2025.106959

Evaluation of drug permeability across Ex vivo nasal mucosa: A simulation-based approach to minimize thickness-related variability

2025· article· en· W4409661418 on OpenAlex
Sheng Zhao, Jieyu Zuo, Tyson S. Le, Jeerakit Kerdsiri, Neti Waranuch, Neal M. Davies, Raimar Löbenberg

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Stroke ConsortiumChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsEx vivoPermeability (electromagnetism)Mucous membrane of noseBiomedical engineeringIn vivoMaterials scienceDrugMedicinePharmacologyPathologyChemistryBiologyBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ex vivo nasal mucosa is commonly used for the study on drug permeability for nasal drug delivery. Thickness variations in porcine nasal mucosa (0.26–1.47 mm) were found to significantly impact permeation curve results in Franz diffusion cell experiments, introducing variability and complicating data interpretation. To mitigate these effects, a numerical simulation method was developed using COMSOL Multiphysics® to normalize permeation curve to a standardized mucosal thickness. Using this method, the permeability of five compounds with diverse solubility and lipophilicity profiles was evaluated. Melatonin, triamcinolone acetonide, and mitragynine exhibited high permeability, while cannflavin A and cannflavin B showed negligible permeability. The apparent permeability coefficients (Papp) of mitragynine, melatonin, and triamcinolone acetonide were initially obscured by differences in mucosal thickness, masking their statistical differences. However, after normalization, statistically significant differences became evident. These findings highlight the critical role of mucosal thickness correction in ex vivo permeability studies to ensure accurate and comparable data across different experimental setups and drug candidates, supporting the development of reliable nasal drug delivery systems. Furthermore, this method can be extended to permeability studies involving other species or even other types of tissues, broadening its applicability and potential in drug delivery research. • Quantified mucosal thickness variability across nasal regions and its impact on drug permeation. • Developed a simulation-based method to correct mucosal thickness for permeability curve normalization. • Compared permeability of five compounds to gain insight into nasal drug delivery performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it