MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409663184 · doi:10.5800/gt-2025-16-2-0824

DEBRIS SOURCE AREA EVOLUTION DURING FORMATION OF THE URALIAN FOREDEEP AT THE SAKMARIAN STAGE OF THE EARLY PERMIAN ACCORDING TO U-Pb LA-ICP-MS ISOTOPE DATING OF DETRITAL ZIRCONS

2025· article· en· W4409663184 on OpenAlexaff
E. A. Volodina, A. V. Tevelev, A. A. BORISENKO, Egor Koptev, А. S. Novikova, А. S. Dubenskiy, K. G. Erofeeva

Bibliographic record

VenueGeodynamics & Tectonophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPermianStage (stratigraphy)DebrisPaleontologyGeochemistryOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents the results of studying the sources of terrigenous material deposition in the Uralian foredeep according to U-Pb dating of detrital zircons from terrigenous rocks of four stratigraphic levels of the Kapysov formation (Sakmarian stage). The Kapysov formation is one of the formations of the Lower Permian section of the Yuryuzano-Sylvenskaya depression in the Uralian foredeep. It is composed of conglomerates and sandstones and unconformably overlies the underlying formations. Samples 14110 and 14110-1 were taken from the same section exposed in the quarry near the village of Tatarsky Maloyaz, from coarse-grained sandstones of the conglomerate matrix in the lower parts of the formation; sample 15004 was taken in the quarry near the town of Mikhailovsk, from gravel sandstones in the middle part of the formation; sample 18228 was taken in the quarry at the southern end of the village of Elgildino, from sandstones of the upper part of the formation. In each sample. there were determined two zircon populations: Precambrian (mostly rounded grains) and Paleozoic (mostly unrounded grains). The relative amount of grains of the Precambrian population decreases gradually up the section from 90.9 to 31.8 %, with a corresponding increase in the amount of Paleozoic zircons. The Precambrian zircon age spectra of all samples are approximately the same, which suggests that they were derived from the same source. This assumption does not contradict the results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (the coefficient varies from 0.316 to 0.999). These spectra are almost identical with the zircon age spectra in the Vendian Asha group of the Bashkir megazone from which the detrital zircon grains could have been derived. This situation suggests a very likely possibility of short-distance transportation since the complexes of the Yuryuzano-Sylvenskaya depression are overlapping directrly with the Bashkir megazone. The age spectra of the Paleozoic deterital zircon grains differ significantly for different levels. The Paleozoic zircon population gradually attains the younger age up the section of the the Kapysov formation: from the Ems to the Middle Carboniferous. Zircon grains with an age of about 400 million years could have been derived by erosion of the ophiolite and island-arc rocks of the Urals whose age is similar to that of the Baymak-Buribai complex. The Carboniferous zircon crystals are the products of the destruction of magmatic complexes in the Magnitogorsk and East Ural megazones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeodynamics & TectonophysicsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207