MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409665061 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/z254e_v1

ALVINA DAMAYANTI (155100004)

2018· preprint· id· W4409665061 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alvina Damayanti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and language evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A.STUDI KASUS ( SK )Pertanyaan Type C : Paparkan dan jelaskan Product Knowledge (KS) / Produk Tim Anda (KP)!Jawaban : Produk yang akan saya paparkan yaitu produk seperangkat komputer yang bermerk SKM H4K1, produk ini dipatenkan oleh sekelompok remaja yang diberinama HASKELL, yang berdiri di Provinsi Lampung dan juga mengusung kebudayaan Lampung yaitu siger dan tapis.B.STUDI REFERENSI ( SP )Pertanyaan Jenis B :Jelaskan Pasal-pasal pendukung didalam Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual!Jawaban : HAKI merupakan hak eksklusif yang diberikan negara kepada seseorang, sekelompok orang, maupun lembaga untuk memegang kuasa dalam menggunakan dan mendapatkan manfaat dari kekayaan intelektual yang dimiliki atau diciptakan. C.STUDI PENALARAN ( SP )Pertanyaan Kategori 3 :Buatlah Penjelasan Secara Detail product BLACKBERRY dan beberapa bagian HAKI yang ikut serta didalamnya.Jawaban :Blackberry adalah telepon seluler yang mempunyai kemampuan layanan push e-mail, telepon, sms, menjelajah internet, BlackBerry Messenger (BBM), dan berbagai kemampuan nirkabel lainnya. Hak paten dari produk blackberry ini adalah Mike Lazaridis dan Doug Fregin yang merupakan orang yang berkebangsaan Waterloo, Ontario, Kanada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5340.238

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLinguistics and language evolutionFrench-language works237,207