Romantic relationship challenges and young men’s mental health in Canadian-based undergraduate university students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective Young adulthood is a unique period when most men’s romantic relationships are in nascent stages. The current study aimed to explore the impact of romantic relationship challenges on young men’s mental health in a national sample of undergraduate Canadian-based university students.Participants A reference group from the 2022 National College Health Assessment was analyzed (N = 2,036), comprising young men (18–24 years) who were enrolled in full-time undergraduate studies in Canada.Methods Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was used to examine differences in psychological distress, loneliness, suicide risk, and positive mental health based on relationship distress.Result Overall, 816 respondents (40.1%) reported experiencing a romantic relationship challenge in the last 12 months. Young men who experienced a distressed relationship reported higher levels of psychological distress (partial η2 = .043), loneliness (partial η2 = .050), and suicidal behavior (partial η2 = .034), and lower levels of positive mental health (partial η2 = .011).Conclusions The findings reflect significant mental health concerns for young men who experience relationship challenges, underscoring the need to provide tailored services to young men in navigating their romantic relationships, including a relationship breakdown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".