MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409674112 · doi:10.4171/rmi/1556

On endomorphism algebras of $\textup{GL}_{2}$-type abelian varieties and Diophantine applications

2025· article· en· W4409674112 on OpenAlexaff
Franco Golfieri Madriaga, Ariel Pacetti, Lucas Villagra Torcomian

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Matemática Iberoamericana · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndomorphismDiophantine equationAbelian groupMathematicsType (biology)Pure mathematicsArithmetic of abelian varietiesRank of an abelian groupAlgebra over a fieldElementary abelian groupBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let f and g be two different newforms without complex multiplication having the same coefficient field. The main result of the present article proves that an isomorphism between the residual Galois representations attached to f and to g for a large prime p (depending only on g ) implies that the endomorphism algebra of the abelian variety A_{f} , attached to f by the Eichler–Shimura construction (after tensoring with \mathbb{Q} ), is a subalgebra of the endomorphism algebra of the abelian variety A_{g} attached to g . This implies important relations between their building blocks. A non-trivial application of our result is that for all prime numbers d congruent to 3 modulo 8 satisfying that the class number of \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-d}) is prime to 3 , the equation x^{4}+dy^{2} =z^{p} has no non-trivial primitive solutions when p is large enough. We prove a similar result for the equation x^{2}+dy^{6}=z^{p} .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Matemática IberoamericanaSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207