MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409674792 · doi:10.7202/1116953ar

Le cinéma québécois des années 1960 vu par ses critiques

2012· article· fr· W4409674792 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Hubert Sabino

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles vues Revue sur les pratiques les théories et l histoire du cinéma au Québec · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDéjà vuArtHumanitiesPsychologyCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article propose d’étudier la réception du cinéma québécois dans les revues Séquences et Objectif pendant la décennie 1960. Cherchant à faire ressortir les grandes lignes du discours de cette critique, il permet d’observer les différents points de vue qu’elle porte sur la production cinématographique nationale en cette période d’exploration pour les cinéastes québécois, mais aussi de transformation sociopolitique et idéologique pour la société québécoise. Cette analyse met en lumière, notamment, un déphasage entre les critiques de l’époque et la cinématographie locale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.015
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles vues Revue sur les pratiques les théories et l histoire du cinéma au QuébecSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207