<i>Low Cost (Claude Jutra)</i> ou la mobilisation d’un héritage. <i>Pocket film</i> et technique identitaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Réalisé entièrement à l’aide d’un téléphone portable, Low Cost (Claude Jutra) de Lionel Baier se veut à la fois un film autobiographique intimiste et un hommage subtil au cinéaste Claude Jutra. Ce film réflexif est surtout remarquable en ce qu’il ne tente pas de s’inspirer du mode narratif autofictionnel du cinéaste québécois, mais en ce qu’il actualise à l’aide de l’appareil numérique mobile – ou le « téléphone intelligent » – une subjectivation des procédés ou une technique identitaire qui, chez Jutra, avait pour conséquence le dévoilement de l’être. Cet article cherche ainsi moins à comprendre ce qui, dans le cinéma de Jutra, a pu inspirer Lionel Baier, qu’à saisir ce qui, dans la figure du cinéaste Jutra, se prolonge jusque dans ce nouvel « usage » cinématographique de l’appareil numérique mobile qu’est le pocket film.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".