Mapping brain-wide activity networks: brainways as a tool for neurobiological discovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifying brain-wide neural circuits and targeting these areas for neuropharmacological interventions are significant challenges in contemporary neuroscience. Traditional methods for registering and quantifying fluorescence in brain slices are labor-intensive and struggle to extract functional insights from complex datasets. To address these challenges, we introduce Brainways-an AI-based, open-source software that streamlines neural network identification from digital imaging to network analysis. Brainways facilitates neurobiological research by enabling automatic registration of coronal brain slices to any 3D brain atlas, along with precise quantification of fluorescent markers, such as activity markers and tracers, across brain regions. Brainways incorporates advanced statistical tools to identify neural patterns and functional networks associated with specific experimental contrasts. Trained on rat and mouse brain atlases, Brainways achieves over 93% atlas registration accuracy. The software also allows users to easily adjust the automatic registration through a user-friendly interface for enhanced accuracy. We present two experiment analyses demonstrating Brainways' capabilities. The first replicates and extends findings from a prior experiment on pro-social behavior in rats, wherein rats learned to free a trapped cagemate from a restrainer under ingroup and outgroup social conditions. Using Brainways, we analyzed approximately 300 times more tissue area than in our previous manual approach. The second experiment utilizes Multiplex RNAscope imaging for whole-brain registration, enabling combined quantification of cell type expression and activity markers. These analyses highlight Brainways' ability to link specific cell types and their activity to task conditions, providing detailed neural insights. Brainways offers a rapid and accurate solution for large-scale neurobiological projects, creating new opportunities to understand neural networks underlying complex behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".