MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409681133 · doi:10.1088/1361-6544/adca81

The incompressible Navier–Stokes limit from the discrete-velocity BGK Boltzmann equation

2025· article· en· W4409681133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinearity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsMathematicsLimit (mathematics)CompressibilityBoltzmann equationMathematical analysisMechanicsPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we extend the Bardos–Golse–Levermore program (Bardos et al 1993 Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 46 667–753) to prove that a local weak solution to the d -dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>⩾</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) can be constructed by taking the hydrodynamic limit of a discrete-velocity Boltzmann equation with a simplified Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook collision operator. Moreover, in the case when the dimension is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , we characterise the combinations of finitely many particle velocities and probabilities that lead to the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in the hydrodynamic limit. Numerical computations conducted in two-dimensional indicate that in the case of the simplest velocity lattice (D2Q9), the rate with which this hydrodynamic limit is achieved is of order <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic">O</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is the Knudsen number. For the future investigations, it is worth considering if the hydrodynamic limit of the discrete-velocity Boltzmann equation can be also rigorously justified in the presence of non-trivial boundary conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it