User-Centric Multi-Static Sensing for Joint User and Target Tracking in Mobile Wireless Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel user-centric sensing framework, where a user equipment (UE) acts as the receiver of a multi-static radar sensing system and utilizes the communication signals emitted by base stations (BSs) and scattered by the targets for joint UE and target tracking. Specifically, we propose to locate the UE using the least squares (LS) estimator with a one-dimensional (1D) search and then develop a two-dimensional (2D) target identification approach using the estimated target location and motion of each path based on mean-shift clustering. After the motion parameters of the UE and targets are estimated, a joint UE and target tracking algorithm is designed based on the analysis of the localization and motion estimation errors. Extensive simulations corroborate the ability of our approach to estimate target parameters and cluster and identify targets. Specifically, the average estimation error of the target number is only 0.18. The speed and heading accuracy of the UE and targets is [0.121 m/s, 3.879°] and [0.199 m/s, 4.669°], respectively. In joint UE and target tracking, our scheme outperforms the benchmarks of the extended Kalman filter (EKF) and belief propagation (BP) by at least 33.16% and 10.29%, respectively, even though the EKF and BP require a-priori knowledge of the motion parameters and target identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".