MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409683529 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3555188

Synchronous Image-Label Diffusion Probability Model With Application to Stroke Lesion Segmentation on Non-Contrast CT

2025· article· en· W4409683529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersHigh Performance Computing Platform of Jiangsu UniversityNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsContrast (vision)Artificial intelligenceStroke (engine)LesionSegmentationDiffusionImage (mathematics)MedicineComputer scienceRadiologyComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)PathologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stroke lesion volume is a key radiologic measurement for assessing the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, which is challenging to be automatically measured on noncontrast CT (NCCT) scans. Recent diffusion probabilistic models (DPMs) in the domain of image generation have shown potentials of being used for lesion volume segmentation on medical images. In this article, a novel synchronous image-label diffusion probability model (SDPM) is proposed for stroke lesion segmentation on NCCT using a dual-Markov diffusion process with shared noise. The proposed SDPM is fully based on a generative latent variable model (LVM), offering a probabilistic elaboration from stem to stem. To fit into our segmentation tasks using the strength from generation models, we develop the architecture of the network where an additional net-stream, parallel with a noise prediction stream, is introduced to obtain the initial label estimates with noise for efficiently inferring the final labels. By optimizing the specified variational boundaries, the trained model can infer the final label estimates given the input images at any scale of time in four different label-inference methods, which gives more flexibility to the proposed SDPM. The proposed model was assessed on three stroke lesion datasets including one public and two private datasets. Compared with several U-Net, transformer, and DPM-based segmentation methods, our proposed SDPM model is able to achieve the state-of-the-art accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it