Effects of wintering under methylmercury exposure on spring reproductive onset in song sparrows ( <i>Melospiza melodia</i> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exposure to methylmercury (MeHg) on breeding grounds may have numerous deleterious effects on birds, including neurotoxicity, disruption of hormones, and impaired reproduction. But it is unknown if MeHg exposure on wintering grounds can carry over and produce negative effects on the following spring breeding seasonal transition. To evaluate this, we exposed male captive song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) to environmentally relevant levels of dietary MeHg for 3 months during winter. We then photostimulated the birds with a long-day photoperiod and observed them for 21 days post-exposure. Contrary to our predictions, we found no carry-over effects of MeHg on the timing of changes in spring reproductive physiology assessed by testes mass, syrinx mass, plasma androgen concentrations, number of GnRH neurosecretory cells, and body condition. However, following photostimulation, MeHg-exposed birds had smaller cloacal protuberances. Although we observed no obvious effects on the timing of reproductive onset, the results suggest that winter MeHg exposure could induce carry-over effects on secondary sexual traits that may affect birds' breeding performance. Overall, our findings indicate that songbirds can buffer against the main effects of prior winter MeHg exposure so as to not delay reproductive onset in spring, but more studies are required for long-term effects on breeding performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".