MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409701609 · doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf044.197

Predisposing factors of infective endocarditis and their relation to microbiological findings

2025· article· en· W4409701609 on OpenAlexaff
A Gomez Gonzalez, G Padilla Rodriguez, M Nunez Ruiz, Cáceres López, A Pena Rodriguez, Luis Eduardo López-Cortés

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsCanarie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfective endocarditisEndocarditisInternal medicineIntensive care medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Understanding the predisposing factors for infective endocarditis (IE) is essential for implementing prevention strategies, prophylaxis, and providing recommendations related to hygiene and other habits. The objective of our study was to investigate possible predisposing factors for IE and compare them with the microbiological findings obtained. Methods A registry of patients diagnosed with IE between 2016 and 2022 at a reference hospital for cardiovascular surgery was utilized. These patients were grouped according to the type of microbiological isolation. These groups were analyzed based on their baseline characteristics, cardiac and extracardiac predisposing factors. Lastly, risk factors present or occurring in proximity to the IE event (endoscopic procedures, dental work, venous infections, etc.) were considered. Results A total of 189 patients were included, with Enterococcus being the microorganisms most frequently isolated (N=36), followed by S. epidermidis (N=33) and S. aureus (N=35). The median age was 69 years, with differences among groups, showing that patients with infections by Enterococcus, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. bovis presented with IE at an older age (p<0.01). It was found that 61% of patients with IE had some type of pre-existing heart disease, with the presence of valvular heart disease (at least moderate) being the most common (42%). Among these, there was a high frequency of patients with bicuspid valve disease (7%, representing 20% of IE cases in the aortic position), and these patients had a younger age (mean 52 years). The precursor risk factors are described in the image. Conclusions The Enterococcus family was the most frequently isolated in this study, being associated with recent diagnoses of urothelial tumors and urinary tract instrumental procedures. S. bovis was related to procedures in the gastrointestinal tract and digestive tumors. S. aureus was associated with episodes of phlebitis, and S. viridans with dental procedures, although without reaching significance. The most common predisposing heart disease was valvular heart disease. Bicuspid valve disease was frequent and was associated with infections in younger patients and with microorganisms typical of oral, skin, and urinary tract flora (S. epidermidis, Enterococcus, and S. viridans).Image 1Image 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular CareSame topicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207