Quarter Life Crisis pada Mahasiswa ditinjau dari Faktor Demografi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan Quarterlife crisis berdasarkan demografi pada Mahasiswa di Kota Makassar. Responden yang terlibat sebanyak 649 mahasiswa yang berusia 18-25. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan menggunakan instrumen pengumpulan data berupa skala Quarterlife Crisis (a=0.945,n=41) yang dikembangkan berdasarkan teori quarterlife crisis oleh Robbins dan Wilner (2001). Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik uji komparatif. Temuan dari hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan ada perbedaan tingkat quarterlife crisis berdasarkan variabel jenis kelamin (p=0.027), tingkat semester (p=0.028), dan relasi romantis (p=0.024). Sedangkan berdasarkan variabel status pekerjaan dan tempat tinggal, tidak ditemukan adanya perbedaan tingkat quarterlife crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".