MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409709495 · doi:10.1039/d4fo06152g

Extended recommendations on the nomenclature for microbial catabolites of dietary (poly)phenols, with a focus on isomers

2025· review· en· W4409709495 on OpenAlexaff
Claudio Curti, Michael N. Clifford, Colin D. Kay, Pedro Mena, Ana Rodriguez‐Mateos, Daniele Del Rio, Gordon J. McDougall, Gary Williamson, Cristina Andrés‐Lacueva, Letizia Bresciani, Britt Burton‐Freeman, Aedín Cassidy, Yves Desjardins, César G. Fraga, Chris I. R. Gill, Paul A. Kroon, Nikolai Kuhnert, Iziar A. Ludwig, Claudine Manach, Dragan Milenković, Cláudia Nunes dos Santos, Patricia I. Oteiza, Gema Pereira‐Caro, Francisco A. Tómas‐Barberán, David S. Wishart, Alan Crozier

Bibliographic record

VenueFood & Function · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversité Laval
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceKing Saud UniversityEuropean CommissionUniversità degli Studi di ParmaU.S. Department of AgricultureScottish GovernmentRural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division
KeywordsPhenolsChemistryGut floraFood scienceBiochemistryOrganic chemistryStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

, 1051-1068, DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa204), by providing additional structures, and addressing the difficulties that can arise when investigating regioisomers and stereoisomers, where subtle differences in structure can have a substantial impact on bioactivity. The information provided will help to better harmonize the literature, facilitate data retrieval and provide a reference for researchers in several fields, especially nutrition and biochemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood & FunctionSame topicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207