Deteksi Tepi Optimal dengan Integrasi Canny, CLAHE, dan Perona-Malik Diffusion Filter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Edge detection is a fundamental technique in digital image processing, crucial for identifying object boundaries. However, detecting edges in low-intensity and noisy images remains a significant challenge. This study proposes an optimal edge detection method by integrating the Canny algorithm, Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), and Perona-Malik Diffusion Filter, with automatic kappa (k) value determination using the Fractional Order Sobel Mask. The process begins with noise reduction through the Perona-Malik Diffusion Filter, followed by local contrast enhancement using CLAHE, and concludes with edge detection via the Canny algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly enhances edge clarity and robustness against noise compared to the conventional Canny algorithm, particularly for low-intensity images and images with noise. Tests on leaf and medical images confirm the effectiveness of this method in improving edge detection quality in digital images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it