Informing a culture shift in high performance sport in Canada: athletes’ unsafe and safe sport experiences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sport system in Canada has been over-run with allegations from athletes that expose the issues of safe sport for participants. To better understand the culture underlying this phenomenon, we explored the manifestations of unsafe and safe high performance (HP) sport, the feelings they evoked, and the values shaping those manifestations from the perspective of HP athletes. We spoke with 28 athletes (18 years+) regarding their HP sport experiences, and their feelings about unsafe and safe aspects. Athletes identified a range of behaviours and practices associated with both unsafe and safe sport conditions. The interpreted values associated with those unsafe and safe sport manifestations are discussed. The findings provide a platform for addressing the needed shift toward a safer sport culture by highlighting the feelings and values that frame unsafe and safe sport, from the athletes’ perspective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it