Baseline Resilience: Tracing Monsoon Adaptations in the Landscape of the Penghu Archipelago, Taiwan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines how monsoon adaptations shape baseline resilience to wind, using the Penghu Archipelago, Taiwan, as a case study. While much resilience research focuses on responses to extreme events, this study sheds light on the role of daily adaptations to the northeast winter monsoons. Through mapping and archival research, we analyze spatial and temporal perspectives to understand how local communities and the government address persistent environmental pressures. The analysis of landscapes, displayed as cumulative records of adaptation, bridges the gap between the contribution of daily practices and systemic requirements for being resilient. Our findings reveal that daily adaptations and intergenerational knowledge form the foundation of resilience, we call it baseline resilience, enabling responses to both recurring monsoon challenges and typhoon events. Adaptations such as walled gardens, reinforced roofs, and windbreak forests demonstrate how long-term human-environment interactions are embedded in the landscape, shaping resilience over generations. As evolving climate scenarios predict weaker monsoons but more intense and frequent extreme typhoons, Penghu faces new challenges that require enhanced resilience strategies. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthened cooperation, and timely reinforcement of strategies to address both current and future challenges effectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".