MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409718470 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2024-0487

Strength prediction of recycled aggregate concrete under sulfate attack using SVR–NSGA-II

2025· article· en· W4409718470 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Libing Jin, Peng Liu, Yesheng Zhang, Pin Zhou, Pengfei Xue, Xiaoyan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAggregate (composite)SulfateEnvironmental scienceStructural engineeringWaste managementEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the prediction of residual compressive strength and mix proportion optimization of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) under sulfate attack using machine learning algorithms. A database with 101 effective samples was used, considering 12 input parameters including raw materials, corrosive media, and exposure conditions and other relevant factors. A support vector regression model was developed to predict RAC strength, showing superior generalization and accuracy compared to traditional mathematical models. Additionally, a combination of nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II and ideal point method was employed to optimize RAC mix proportions, achieving both excellent sulfate resistance and cost efficiency. This research provides intelligent, efficient, and precise references for RAC application in engineering practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceFrench-language works237,207