MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409723492 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3563832

Quantum LSTM Model for Estimation of Energy Expenditure in Human Aging Using Wearable IoT Healthcare Technology

2025· article· en· W4409723492 on OpenAlexafffund
Bao-Nhi Dang Tran, Muhammad Fahim, B. D. E. McNiven, Mohsen Guizani, Hyundong Shin, Trung Q. Duong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOrganizational and Employee Performance
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology PromotionMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaQueen's UniversityNational Research Foundation of KoreaCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaNational Research FoundationQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsWearable computerComputer scienceEstimationInternet of ThingsHealth careWearable technologyEnergy expenditureReal-time computingEmbedded systemMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) offers significant benefits for general healthcare monitoring and has the potential to promote healthy and active aging for elderly individuals. With recent advancements in quantum information and computation, quantum machine learning (QML) has emerged as a tool capable of improving upon the measurement of PAEE. In this paper, we propose a hybrid QML model to predict PAEE which consists of a classical long short-term memory (LSTM) model integrated with a variational quantum circuit (VQC). This model, which we refer to as the enhanced quantum long short-term memory linear (eQLSTML), was subsequently trained and tested using the publicly available GOTOV Human Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure Dataset for Older Individuals. In particular, we study the proposed eQLSTML model with different gate choices in the quantum circuit along with various embedding and layering techniques. Our results indicate our model to be superior in both performance comparisons and prediction when compared to traditional machine learning methods currently employed. Our findings indicate that combining QML approaches with wearable IoT healthcare devices provides a new avenue for personalized healthcare monitoring and an effective method for promoting healthy aging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicOrganizational and Employee PerformanceFrench-language works237,207