MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409723737 · doi:10.1109/tetc.2025.3562136

HyperXArray: Low-Power and Compact Memristive Architecture for In-Memory Encryption on Edge

2025· article· en· W4409723737 on OpenAlexafffund
Jack Cai, Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi, Roman Genov, Amirali Amirsoleimani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceEncryptionArchitectureEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionNon-volatile memoryMemristorComputer architectureEmbedded systemComputer networkComputer hardwareElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Encryption on large-scale memristor crossbars proves to be challenging due to the spatial and temporal fluctuations of the signals coming from numerous non-idealities. To address this, we utilize Hyperlock, a memristive vector-matrix multiplication accelerator employing hyperdimensional computing for encryption. We demonstrate that stochasticity generated on TiOx memristor crossbars with passive 0T1R arrangement can be decryptable under the appropriate training of a neural network. We present HyperXArray, an architecture for Hyperlock's encryption scheme, that is capable of weight regeneration, and analog/digital encryption without the need for high-resolution Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs) and Digital-to-Analog Converters (DACs). We demonstrate 100% decryption accuracy for digital encryption and show that HyperXArray is capable of encryption during analog to digital conversion that reduces the power consumption of ADC by$50\times$. In digital encryption, we show that HyperXArray reduces energy consumption by up to$10\times$and footprint by$10-100\times$compared to Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) implementations of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), while maintaining the same level of throughput. Overall, HyperXArray demonstrates its capability to fill the niche for lightweight, noise-resilient encryption on edge with only$0.1mm^{2}$footprint and$60 pJ/bit$energy efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in ComputingSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207