MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cybersecurity Approaches to IoT Platforms in E-Healthcare Systems

2025· book-chapter· en· W4409728125 on OpenAlexaff
Federick Oscar, Ugochukwu Okwudili Matthew, Hope Ayokunle Oladele, Edidiong Elijah Akpan, Oluwaseun Adeyombo Cole, Bamidele Olalekan Ademilua, Amaonwu Onyebuchi

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsSeneca Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer securityHealth careComputer scienceHealthcare systemInternet privacyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explored the crucial areas of cybersecurity in the healthcare industry, stressing the need to defend healthcare infrastructures and private patient information against online attacks. As part of their applications in electronic healthcare (e-healthcare) services for risk management, fraud detection, and identity authentication to effectively mitigate cyber risks, the current paper proposed bimodal access gateway authentication using artificial neural network (ANN) computer algorithm to secure e-healthcare data warehouse infrastructure. In this study, distributed cloud Internet of Things (IoT) data warehouse server systems were created and connected through 5G radio frequency access network to enable healthcare grid data warehouse information synchronization, resource allocation and service-level optimization. This approach was adopted to strengthen cybersecurity defense and keep systems ahead of every evolving cyber threats in the e-healthcare data warehouse repositories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in computational intelligence and robotics book seriesSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207