MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409728130 · doi:10.1007/s12021-025-09727-4

Mathematical and Dynamic Modeling of the Anatomical Localization of the Insula in the Brain

2025· review· en· W4409728130 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eren Öğüt

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroinformatics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi
KeywordsInsulaNeuroimagingEllipsoidCentral sulcusNeuroscienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyGeologyGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The insula, a deeply situated cortical structure beneath the Sylvian sulcus, plays a critical role in sensory integration, emotion regulation, and cognitive control in the brain. Although several studies have described its anatomical and functional characteristics, mathematical models that quantitatively represent the insula's complex structure and connectivity are lacking. This study aimed to develop a mathematical model to represent the anatomical localization and functional organization of the insula, drawing on current neuroimaging findings and established anatomical data. A three-dimensional (3D) ellipsoid model was constructed to mathematically represent the anatomical boundaries of the insula using Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinate data. This geometric model adapts the ellipsoid equation to reflect the spatial configuration of the insula and is primarily based on cytoarchitectonic mapping and anatomical literature. Relevant findings from prior imaging research, particularly those reporting microstructural variations across insular subdivisions, were reviewed and conceptually integrated to guide the model's structural assumptions and interpretation of potential applications. The ellipsoid-based 3D model accurately represented the anatomical dimensions and spatial localization of the right insula, centered at the MNI coordinates (40, 5, 5 mm), and matched well with the known volumetric data. Functional regions (face, hand, and foot) were successfully plotted within the model, and statistical analysis confirmed significant differences along the anteroposterior and superoinferior axes (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Dynamic simulations revealed oscillatory patterns of excitatory and inhibitory neural activity, consistent with established insular neurophysiology. Additionally, connectivity modeling demonstrated strong bidirectional interactions between the insula and key regions, such as the prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), reflecting its integrative role in brain networks. This study presents a scientifically validated mathematical model that captures the anatomical structure, functional subdivisions, and dynamic connectivity patterns of the insula. By integrating anatomical data with computational simulations, this model provides a foundation for future research in neuroimaging, functional mapping, and clinical applications involving insula-related disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroinformaticsSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207