DTractor enhances cell type deconvolution in spatial transcriptomics by integrating deep neural networks, transfer learning, and matrix factorization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Spatial transcriptomics (ST) captures gene expression with spatial context but lacks single-cell resolution. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) offers high-resolution profiles without spatial information. Accurate spot-level decomposition requires effective integration of both. We present DTractor, a deep learning-based framework that improves cell-type deconvolution in ST data through spatial constraints and transfer learning. DTractor achieves dual utilization of scRNA-seq reference data by incorporating both a cell-type-specific gene expression matrix and learned latent embeddings into a unified matrix factorization model. This joint modeling enables accurate estimation of cell-type proportions and cell-type-resolved gene expression within each spatial spot, while preserving biological and spatial coherence. DTractor further applies spatial regularization to maintain local tissue structure. Across multiple ST platforms and tissue types, DTractor demonstrates improved decomposition accuracy, robustness, and interpretability compared to existing methods. The results from DTractor support downstream applications such as spatial domain analysis and the study of spatially organized cellular behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".