Overcoming Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Chronic Suppurative Lung Disease: Prevalence, Treatment Challenges, and the Promise of Bacteriophage Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a multidrug-resistant pathogen, significantly impacts patients with chronic respiratory conditions like cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF chronic suppurative lung disease (CSLD), contributing to progressive lung damage and poor clinical outcomes. This bacterium thrives in the airway environments of individuals with impaired mucociliary clearance, leading to persistent infections and increased morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements in management of these conditions, treatment failure remains common, emphasising the need for alternative or adjunctive treatment strategies. Bacteriophage therapy, an emerging approach utilising viruses that specifically target bacteria, offers a potential solution to combat P. aeruginosa infections resistant to conventional antibiotics. This review examines the prevalence and disease burden of P. aeruginosa in CF and CSLD, explores the mechanisms behind antibiotic resistance, the promising role of bacteriophage therapy and clinical trials in this sphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".