Understanding natural and accelerated weathering degradation mechanisms of glass and natural fiber composites: A review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among different types of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites, the conventional Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymers (GFRPs), along with the emerging natural fiber replacement options, have attracted widespread attention in different manufacturing sectors. Despite their light weight and high specific strength and stiffness, the long-term durability of these composites remains a gray area, often forcing designers to incorporate large safety factors to account for uncertainties in estimating aging limits. This manuscript aims to provide a review of the fundamentals and case studies on natural and accelerated weathering degradation processes of GFRPs and select Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymers (NFRPs) that involve climatic exposure. Main degradation agents considered range from tap water, moisture, UV, sea water and corrosion. Emphasis is made to differentiate between reported weathering effects on GFRPs and NFRPs, primarily owing to the hydrophilic nature of natural fibers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".