MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THE SYMBOLIC INTEGRATION OF CHILDREN INTO RURAL COMMUNITIES OF UKRAINIANS IN THE NINETEENTH AND THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY

2025· article· en· W4409736882 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Notes Series Pedagogical Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)HistorySociologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the publication, when covering the issue of integration of children into rural society using customary ritual practice, the authors proceed from the following principles: the ideological foundations of the traditional culture of Ukrainians of the 19th – the first quarter of the 20th centuries were based on a complex of beliefs and ideas of the Christian religion and the principles of the magical consciousness of paganism; the functional factor remained elements of archaic consciousness as immanent components of the worldview system of the times of the Indo-European community. The ritual was used as a regulatory paradigm in traditional culture that was based on the idea of the cyclical nature of time. The complex of folk custom-ritual culture clearly defined and symbolized the boundaries of children’s lives, noting the passage of a child at a certain stage on the path of their growing up. Reaching the age of one was a significant moment in a child’s life. The significance of this age limit in the folk pedagogy of Ukrainians was manifested in the removal of certain old rules and the emergence of new prohibitions and regulations. From 1 to 3–4 years old, the child experienced a new stage in his life, during which he entered the «world of culture», and with it, some changes in everyday and ritual attitudes towards him were also associated. The next important transitional stage in the life of children was the age of 7, which was associated in folk pedagogy of Ukrainians with a new change in their status positions. The inclusion of them in the family’s active work resulted in this happening. The article centers on the subject of socialization, which has a direct impact on the child’s incorporation into rural society. Parents played a key role in this process. Furthermore, grandparents played a significant role in the process of socialization and enculturation of the child. The oldest generation primarily acted as agents of indirect transmission of ethnocultural values. From the age of six to seven, the child increasingly began to communicate with older children. This category of socializers ensured that the child mastered social experience and cultural traditions when communicating with their peers. One of the forms of socialization for the younger generation through the community, the fellow villagers was the institute of admission. Godparents acted as intermediaries and mediators of the community in the process of socializing the child. It was the institution of nepotism that the community was responsible for further socializing the child.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.013
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it