Induction of cardiac fibulin-4 protects against pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The prevailing view of fibulin-4 deficient mice is that the cardiac phenotype is the result of aortic and/or valvular disease. In the present study, we have tested whether the cardiac phenotype is, at least in part, the consequence of primary cardiac effects of fibulin-4. We have found fibulin-4 expression to be activated throughout the myocardium in wildtype (fibulin-4 +/+ ) C57Bl/6J;129 Sv mice subjected to transverse aortic constriction (TAC). In contrast, haploinsufficient fibulin-4 +/R mice exposed to severe TAC do not show this increase in myocardial fibulin-4 expression, but display altered physical properties of myocardial tissue. Moreover, TAC-induced cardiac fibrosis, pulmonary congestion, and mortality are aggravated in fibulin-4 +/R mice. In vitro investigations of myocardial tissue show that fibulin-4 deficiency results in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and a decreased beating frequency and contractile force. In conclusion, we demonstrate functions for fibulin-4 in cardiac homeostasis and show that reduced fibulin-4 expression drives myocardial disease in response to cardiac pressure overload, independent of aortic valvular pathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".