MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409742570 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25726

Investigation on the performance optimization of sludge spray nozzles based on computational fluid dynamics coupled with discrete phase model

2025· article· en· W4409742570 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yongkang Hao, Xiaoyu Li, Yuekan Zhang, Anjun Li, Bo Zhi Chen, Peikun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleComputational fluid dynamicsPhase (matter)Materials scienceComputer scienceMechanicsMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To reduce the energy consumption and operational costs associated with thermal sludge drying, this study integrated spray technology with sludge drying and designed a spray nozzle specifically for sludge spray drying. Theoretical research and numerical simulations were employed to examine the impact of nozzle structural parameters on the spray field, optimizing the nozzle's spray angle to improve sludge drying efficiency. The results show that as the nozzle angle increases, the pressure rises and the velocity and turbulence energy first decrease and then increase. When the nozzle angle was 120°, the sludge droplets gained the maximum kinetic energy, which maximized the effective area of the spray, resulting in the best crushing effect and the highest sludge particle drying efficiency. Finally, industrial experiments were performed, demonstrating that sludge with a moisture content of approximately 85% was reduced to about 35% after spray drying treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207