MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409758462 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554372

The eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey (eFEDS)

2025· article· en· W4409758462 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Catarina Aydar, A. Merloni, T. Dwelly, Johan Comparat, M. Salvato, J. Buchner, M. Brusa, Tingting Liu, J. Wolf, S.F. Anderson, Carolina Andonie, F. E. Bauer, Michael R. Blanton, W. N. Brandt, Y. Díaz, L. Hernández-García, T. Miyaji, B. Musiimenta, C. A. Negrete, Qingling Ni, C. Ricci, A. Schwope, Y. P. Shen, Sophia G. H. Waddell, R. Arcodia, Dmitry Bizyaev, Joseph N. Burchett, Pulak K. Chakraborty, Kevin R. Covey, B. T. Gänsicke, A. Georgakakis, P.J. Green, H. Ibarra, J. Ider-Chitham, Anton M. Koekemoer, Juna A. Kollmeier, M. Krumpe, G. Lamer, A. Malyali, K. Nandra, Kaike Pan, C. Pizarro, José Sánchez-Gallego, Jonathan R. Trump, T. Urrutia

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie ActionsRussian Academy of SciencesJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Colorado BoulderMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamChina National Textile and Apparel CouncilNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnYale UniversityUniversity of TorontoCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversität HamburgUniversity of PennsylvaniaÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoSpace Telescope Science InstitutePennsylvania State UniversityEberhard Karls Universität TübingenAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahHarvard UniversityOhio State UniversityMax-Planck-GesellschaftSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryFlatiron HealthSmithsonian InstitutionYunnan UniversityNational Science FoundationNanjing UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityEuropean CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsX-rayX-ray spectroscopyAstronomySpectroscopyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present one of the largest uniform optical spectroscopic surveys of X-ray selected sources to date that were observed as a pilot study for the Black Hole Mapper (BHM) survey. The BHM program of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)-V is designed to provide optical spectra for hundreds of thousands of X-ray selected sources from the SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey. This significantly improves our ability to classify and characterise the physical properties of large statistical populations of X-ray emitting objects. Our sample consists of 13 079 sources in the eROSITA eFEDS performance verification field, 12 011 of which provide reliable redshifts from 0 ≲ z ≤ 5.8. The vast majority of these objects were detected as point-like sources (X-ray flux limit F 0.5 − 2 keV ≳ 6.5 × 10 −15 erg/s/cm 2 ) and were observed for about 20 years with fibre-fed SDSS spectrographs. After including all available redshift information for the eFEDS sources from the dedicated SDSS-V plate programme and archival data, we visually inspected the SDSS optical spectra to verify the reliability of these redshift measurements and the performance of the SDSS pipeline. The visual inspection allowed us to recover reliable redshifts (for 99% of the spectra with a signal-to-noise ratio of > 2) and to assign classes to the sources, and we confirm that the vast majority of our sample consists of active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Only ∼3% of the eFEDS/SDSS sources are Galactic objects. We analysed the completeness and purity of the spectroscopic redshift catalogue, in which the spectroscopic completeness increases from 48% (full sample) to 81% for a cleaner, brighter ( r AB < 21.38) sample that we defined by considering a high X-ray detection likelihood, a reliable counterpart association, and an optimal sky coverage. We also show the diversity of the optical spectra of the X-ray selected AGNs and provide spectral stacks with a high signal-to-noise ratio in various sub-samples with different redshift and optical broad-band colours. Our AGN sample contains optical spectra of (broad-line) quasars, narrow-line galaxies, and optically passive galaxies. It is considerably diverse in its colours and in its levels of nuclear obscuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207