MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409761670 · doi:10.1109/vrw66409.2025.00222

SHAPE: Safe Hydrogen Agile Pipeline Engineering with XR and AI-Enhanced Digital Twins

2025· article· en· W4409761670 on OpenAlexaff
Nanjia Wang, Muskan Sarvesh, Bryson Lawton, Ryan Kang, Hyeongil Nam, Sina Rezvani, Kangsoo Kim, Ron Hugo, Simon Park, Bob Brennan, Frank Maurer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgile software developmentPipeline (software)Computer scienceSoftware engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Safe Hydrogen Agile Pipeline Engineering (SHAPE) project aims to develop and study an innovative Digital Twin (DT) system enhanced by eXtended Reality (XR) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to improve hydrogen pipeline management. This system connects a custom-built pipeline facility with an immersive XR environment, enabling real-time, bidirectional data exchange. By leveraging AI capabilities for leak detection, risk analysis, and anomaly prediction, the system enhances operational safety, efficiency, and reliability. The XR environment offers intuitive navigation, immersive data visualization, and interactive training experiences, supported by intelligent virtual agents and embodied avatars to facilitate collaboration and decision-making. By sharing these developments, we aim to foster discussions with the workshop audience on advancing XR and AI-enabled DT technologies for safer and more sustainable hydrogen pipeline operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207