Unrolling Plug-and-Play Gradient Graph Laplacian Regularizer for Image Restoration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generic deep learning (DL) networks for image restoration like denoising and interpolation lack mathematical interpretability, require voluminous training data to tune large parameter sets, and are fragile in the face of covariate shift. To address these shortcomings, we build interpretable networks by unrolling variants of a graph-based optimization algorithm of different complexities. Specifically, for a general linear image formation model, we first formulate a convex quadratic programming (QP) problem with a new $\ell _{2}$ -norm graph smoothness prior called gradient graph Laplacian regularizer (GGLR) that promotes piecewise planar (PWP) signal reconstruction. To solve the posed unconstrained QP problem, instead of computing a linear system solution straightforwardly, we introduce a variable number of auxiliary variables and correspondingly design a family of ADMM algorithms. We then unroll them into variable-complexity feedforward networks, amenable to parameter tuning via back-propagation. More complex unrolled networks require more labeled data to train more parameters, but have better overall performance. The unrolled networks have periodic insertions of a graph learning module, akin to a self-attention mechanism in a transformer architecture, to learn pairwise similarity structure inherent in data. Experimental results show that our unrolled networks perform competitively to generic DL networks in image restoration quality while using only a fraction of parameters, and demonstrate improved robustness to covariate shift.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".