MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409764179 · doi:10.1089/neur.2025.0006

Recovery from Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Nonathletic Population: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4409764179 on OpenAlexaff
Véronique Déry, Rosemarie Picard, Pierre Langevin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurotrauma Reports · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationClinique Paro ExcellenceCentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services SociauxUniversité LavalCanadian Physiotherapy Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryMedicinePopulationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to document the resolution rate of mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) symptoms at various time points in a nonathletic adult population and identify prognostic factors influencing recovery. Sixteen prospective cohort studies were included, focusing on participants aged 18-65 with acute mTBI, followed for a minimum of 1 month. The recovery criterion was the resolution of symptoms not attributable to pre-existing conditions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, with most studies rated as moderate risk, highlighting variability in methodological rigor. Symptom resolution was reported in 49.0% to 69.5% of patients at 1 month, 40.8% to 84.4% at 3 months, 38.3% to 72.2% at 6 months, and 58.1 to 68.3% at 12 months. These findings emphasize the first 6 months as a critical period for evaluating the risk of symptom chronicity. The most commonly reported prognostic factors was baseline symptom severity, including higher intensity of symptoms such as headaches, nausea, and dizziness, as well as elevated scores on validated symptom scales. Psychiatric history, such as pre-existing anxiety or depression, was also a significant predictor of prolonged symptoms. Biomarkers, including NSE and S-100B levels, and reduced blood-derived neurotrophic factors, were associated with poorer recovery at 6 months. Demographic factors, including age, gender, and education level, showed mixed results. While some studies associated female gender, older age, and lower education with poorer recovery, others found no significant correlations. These discrepancies highlight the complexity of mTBI prognosis. Overall, more than half of patients recover within 6 months, but persistent symptoms can have a profound impact on quality of life and functional status. Identifying patients at higher risk of prolonged recovery is crucial for targeted management strategies, emphasizing the importance of individualized, evidence-based care in mTBI populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0090.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurotrauma ReportsSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207