MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409768695 · doi:10.18162/fp.2024.880

Les conseillers pédagogiques dans l’enseignement supérieur québécois : profils et activités

2024· article· fr· W4409768695 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sonia Proust-Androwkha, Constance Denis, Christelle Lison, Florian Meyer

Bibliographic record

VenueFormation et profession · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude s’inscrit dans une recherche plus large visant à comprendre les responsabilités, les rôles et les défis des conseillers pédagogiques (CP) travaillant dans l’enseignement supérieur francophone québécois. L’article décrit le contexte professionnel des CP et les activités qu’ils effectuent dans ce cadre. L’analyse de 195 questionnaires établit une liste exhaustive des activités pratiquées, révélant des similarités entre les secteurs collégial et universitaire. Par leur polyvalence, les CP doivent composer avec une fragmentation importante de leur temps de travail. Les résultats suggèrent d’alléger la charge des CP pour mieux soutenir les transformations institutionnelles, sur les plans organisationnel, pédagogique et numérique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFormation et professionSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207