MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409775853 · doi:10.1108/jm2-05-2024-0150

Machine learning scrap steel price forecasts for the regional east Chinese market

2025· article· en· W4409775853 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Modelling in Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScrapBusinessIndustrial organizationComputer scienceEconomicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Investors and governments have traditionally depended on estimates of prices of various commodities. Using data from 08/23/2013 to 04/15/2021, this study aims to investigate the challenging problem of forecasting scrap steel prices that are published on a daily basis for the east China regional market. The research has not given much attention to predictions of this important commodity price indicator. Design/methodology/approach Gaussian process regression models, which are estimated using cross-validation approaches with Bayesian optimizations, are used to provide price forecasts. Findings Having a relative root mean square error of 0.4357%, the constructed models appropriately generate price forecasts for the out-of-sample testing stage from 09/17/2019 to 04/15/2021. Originality/value Models designed to research prices can be used by governments and investors to make well-informed decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it