The Analysis of the Liangzhu Culture Based on Jade Artifacts and Architecture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Liangzhu culture was mainly distributed in the Taihu Lake basin and was one of China's important civilizations of the Neolithic Age. Its core area is in the ancient city of Liangzhu in Pingyao Township, Yuhang District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province. With the archaeological excavations of the Liangzhu culture, there have been many speculations about the social structure of the Liangzhu culture. Previous research generally believed that the Liangzhu culture was an alliance of villages within a particular area and that the ruling class in the political center did not have excessive control over other village owners. This article will further explore the possible social structure based on past research on the social structure of the Liangzhu culture. By studying the villages and water conservancy facilities within the Liangzhu culture, this article argues that a power core may have dominated the culture, and its ruling class had specific resource control and administrative rights over the villages within its jurisdiction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it