MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409783513 · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135477

Promising prospects of thermal partial upgrading in reducing diluent requirements for bitumen transportation

2025· article· en· W4409783513 on OpenAlexafffund
Hadi Bagherzadeh, Hassan Hassanzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueFuel · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAsphaltDiluentEnvironmental scienceWaste managementChemistryProcess engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The study integrates partial upgrading and diluent addition to overcome existing limitations. • Olefin reduction in a thermally cracked naphtha is investigated via an acid-catalyzed hydration process. • Partial upgrading with no residence time cuts diluent need from ∼33 vol.% to 9%. • Acid-catalyzed hydration reduces olefin content in the naphtha sample by approximately 52%. Diluent addition and partial upgrading are two distinct techniques aimed at reducing the viscosity of bitumen and enhancing its transportability to refineries. Nevertheless, each method has its own limitations. A practical solution to overcome these challenges, which constitutes the primary objective of this research, is to integrate thermal partial upgrading with diluent addition. The first step of the study entailed thermal partial upgrading of bitumen at 420 °C with no residence time at target temperature. The process notably reduced bitumen viscosity from 169,000 cSt to 752 cSt at 21 °C with minimal coke formation of only 0.03 wt% and gas production of 2.16 wt%. Analysis of the bitumen and upgraded oil compositions revealed that around 20 % of the vacuum residue fraction in the bitumen was converted into the light cut fraction during the upgrading process. Additionally, the total acid number (TAN) decreased from 2.5 to 1.09 mg KOH/g. Asphaltene contents decreased by approximately 3 %, while nitrogen and sulfur contents reduced by around 35 % and 15 %, respectively. However, the olefin content in the upgraded oil (1.89 wt%) slightly exceeded the limit allowed for pipeline transportation (1.0 wt%). In the subsequent step, diluent was added to the partially upgraded oil to meet the viscosity requirements, and the solvent needed for feed bitumen was quantified. The thermal partial upgrading reduced the need for diluent from approximately 33 vol% to 9 vol%. Eventually, acid-catalyzed hydration was suggested as a potential technique for reducing the olefin levels to address the issue of high olefin content. As olefins generated through thermal cracking tend to accumulate in lower boiling fractions such as naphtha (boiling point ≤ 175 °C), acid-catalyzed hydration was examined on a naphtha sample obtained from a thermal partial upgrading process. The proposed approach in this study holds promise for enhancing bitumen processing capacity through no residence time at target temperature while diminishing the need for diluent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuelSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207