MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409784874 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554151

Exploring polarization and geometry in the X-ray pulsar 4U 1538−52

2025· article· en· W4409784874 on OpenAlexaff
Vladislav Loktev, Sofia V. Forsblom, Sergey S. Tsygankov, Juri Poutanen, Alexander A. Mushtukov, Alessandro Di Marco, Jeremy Heyl, Ruth Kelly, Fabio La Monaca, Mason Ng, Swati Ravi, Alexander Salganik, A. Santangelo, В. Ф. Сулейманов, Silvia Zane

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanics and Biomechanics Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationMinistero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione InternazionaleAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsPulsarPolarization (electrochemistry)X-rayAstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) observations of accreting X-ray pulsars (XRPs) continue to provide novel insights into the physics and geometry of these sources. We present the first X-ray polarimetric study of the persistent wind-fed XRP 4U 1538−52, based on five IXPE observations totaling 360 ks, conducted in March and October 2024. We detect marginally significant polarization in the combined data set in the full 2–8 keV energy band, with a polarization degree (PD) of 3.0 ± 1.1% and polarization angle (PA) of −18° ±11°. The energy-resolved analysis shows a clear energy dependence of the polarization properties, with a remarkable ∼70° switch in PA between low and high energies. Similarly, the pulse phase-resolved spectro-polarimetric analysis reveals different signatures at low and high energies. At low energies (2–3 keV), the PD spans from ∼2% up to ∼18%, accompanied by large-amplitude swings in the PA. At higher energies (4–8 keV), the PD varies between ∼3% and ∼12%, and the PA not only is similarly highly variable but also exhibits a markedly different phase dependence. Fitting the rotating vector model to the pulse phase dependence of the PA at the lower energies, we constrain the geometric configuration of the pulsar. The analysis favors a high spin-axis inclination of > 50°, which agrees with both previous pulse-phase-dependent spectral fitting of the cyclotron line region and the known high orbital inclination of the binary system. The magnetic obliquity is estimated to be 30° and the spin position angle to be 19°. A sharp switch in PA around 3 keV presents a particular theoretical challenge, as it is not consistent with the right-angle switch that was only seen in one other pulsar, Vela X-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicMechanics and Biomechanics StudiesFrench-language works237,207