MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409785988 · doi:10.70962/cis2025abstract.6

Primary and Safety Outcomes of a Phase 3 Open-Label, Single-Arm, 12-Week Study of Treatment with PI3Kδ Inhibitor Leniolisib in Pediatric Patients Aged 4–11 Years with Activated PI3Kδ Syndrome (APDS)

2025· article· en· W4409785988 on OpenAlexaff
V. Koneti Rao, Manish J. Butte, Bénédicte Neven, Michaëla Semeraro, Yaël Gernez, Shanmuganathan Chandrakasan, H Kanegane, Takahiro Yasumi, Kazushi Izawa, Alanvin Orpia, Ladan Foruraghi, Lavenda Chirombo Kluczynski, Jason Bradt, Anurag Relan, Gulbu Uzel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Human Immunity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpen labelMedicinePediatricsInternal medicineAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leniolisib is an FDA-approved PI3Kδ inhibitor used to treat activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome (APDS) in patients aged ≥12 years who weigh ≥45 kg. Pediatric patients aged 4 to 11 years with APDS were enrolled in a two-part, prospective, open-label, single-arm, international study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of leniolisib (NCT05438407). Here we report safety and efficacy outcomes following the completion of 12 weeks of leniolisib treatment (part 1). Twenty-six patients were screened; 21 patients enrolled across the United States, France, and Japan (Table 1). Leniolisib was administered orally twice daily (BID) as tablets in 10- and 30-mg strengths, with doses ranging from 20 to 70 mg BID based on weight. Co-primary outcomes were change from baseline (CFB) at 12 weeks in log10-transformed sum of product of diameters (SPD) of index lymph nodes and normalization of naïve B cells. Additional outcomes included changes in spleen volume and quantitative immunoglobulin (Ig) levels, including IgM. Table 1.Patient demographics and baseline characteristics.Patient Characteristic (N=21)ValueAge at time of study, median (range), y7.0 (4-11)Sex, male to female, n13:8Self-identified race, n (%)White9 (42.9)Asian4 (19.0)Other1 (4.8)Not reported/unknown/missing7 (33.3)Self-identified ethnicity, n (%)Hispanic3 (14.3)Non-Hispanic12 (57.1)Not reported6 (28.6)Weight at baseline, median (range), kg23.9 (15.4-44.5)Time since APDS diagnosis, median (range), mo32.9 (2.2-142.2)APDS variant distribution, n (%)PIK3CD17 (81.0)PIK3R14 (19.0)APDS, activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome; PIK3CD, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta; PIK3R1, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1. Both primary end points improved from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment with leniolisib across all dose levels. Mean CFB of log10-transformed SPD reduced by -0.1956 (n = 19). Mean CFB of naïve B cells (CD19+CD27-CD10-) from total B cells was 33.3% (SD, 13.1; n = 11). Mean CFB of spleen log10 volume reduced was -0.1222 (n = 21). Mean Ig levels (n = 14) changed from baseline after 12 weeks of leniolisib treatment: IgM, 2.7 g/L to 1.6 g/L; IgG, 10.1 g/L to 11.1 g/L; and IgA, 0.88 g/L to 0.83 g/L. Leniolisib was well tolerated (Table 2). Twenty patients had treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). All were grades 1 or 2; none were serious. Five patients had treatment-related AEs, including headache, palpitations, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, pruritus, fatigue, decreased neutrophil count, and increased aspartate aminotransferase. No AEs led to discontinuation of study drug treatment. Table 2.Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events.Adverse Events CategoryTotal No. of Patients, n (%)Any TEAE20 (95.2)Grade 120 (95.2)Grade 28 (38.1)Grade 30Grade 40Grade 50Any study treatment-related TEAE5 (23.8)Leading to discontinuation of study treatment0Leading to death0Any serious TEAE0TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event. Overall, leniolisib was well tolerated, reduced lymphoproliferation, and improved normalization of naïve B cells, meeting the co-primary end points. All 21 patients completed part 1, and 20 transitioned to the 1-year treatment extension (one patient discontinued due to social reasons).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Human ImmunitySame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207