MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409786336 · doi:10.70962/cis2025abstract.216

Safety and Tolerability of a New Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIg) 10% (KIg10) in Primary Immunodeficiency (PI) Adult Patients

2025· article· en· W4409786336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Human Immunity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityPrimary immunodeficiencyMedicineAntibodyImmunodeficiencyPiImmunologyInternal medicineAdverse effectChemistryImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy is commonly used in the treatment of primary immunodeficiency (PI) disorders. This open-label, prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase III study in adult PI patients (KIG10_US3_PID01; NCT01581593) investigated efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a new 10% IVIg product (KIg10), given 200 to 800 mg/kg every 21 or 28 days for 48 weeks. Objective Safety and tolerability endpoints from this study are reported here and included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from Day 1 to Week 51/52. Methods Forty-seven patients received study treatment and were analyzed for safety and efficacy. As per protocol, the 1st infusion was administered at an initial rate of 1 mg/kg/min for 30 minutes. If well tolerated, the rate was progressively increased to a maximum of 8 mg/kg/min. The rate of administration of subsequent infusions progressively increased to a maximum of 8 mg/kg/min at 15-min intervals. Results Among both dosing schedules, 22 (46.8%) subjects reported 75 TEAEs. Most frequently reported (≥5%) were headache (25.5%), infusion-related reaction (10.6%), nausea, fatigue, and positive Coombs direct test (8.5% each). The most frequently reported (≥5%) infusional adverse event (AE) (defined as occurring during or within 72 hours after an infusion) were headache (25.5%), fatigue (14.9%), infusion-related reaction (10.6%), nausea (10.6%), positive Coombs direct test (10.6%), diarrhea (6.4%), dizziness (6.4%), and sinusitis (6.4%). No hemolysis events were reported, and no laboratory findings were suggestive of hemolysis associated with positive Coombs tests. No safety signal or trend was observed. None of the reported TEAEs were serious; no significant or life-threatening TEAEs were reported. No AEs led to study discontinuation, and no subjects died during the study due to an AE. Conclusion In study KIG10_US3_PID01, KIg10 showed a favorable safety profile and was well tolerated in adult patients with PI at the dosing schedules and infusion rates used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it