MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409786563 · doi:10.70962/cis2025abstract.2

Post-Transplant Chronic Granulomatous Disease Patient Follow-Up: A PIDTC Survey

2025· article· en· W4409786563 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Human Immunity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of CalgaryMontreal Clinical Research InstituteCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic granulomatous diseaseMedicineGranulomatous diseaseDiseaseDermatologyPathologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is an inborn error of immunity caused by defects in NADPH oxidase, which causes phagocyte dysfunction. CGD is characterized by recurrent infections and autoimmunity. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative therapy. However, data regarding patient satisfaction with post-HSCT state of health and quality of life are lacking. Methods A Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) working group designed online surveys to assess post-HSCT quality of life and satisfaction with transplantation. Surveys were distributed from November 2023 to March 2024 to all members of the CGD Association of America (CGDAA). Adults who personally underwent or parents of children who underwent HSCT for CGD were asked to participate. Two surveys were offered: one for participants who were 18 years or older and one for parents of patients. Results Complete surveys representing 54 unique patients were included for analysis. Forty-four were from parents whose children were a median of 12 years old and a median of 6 years post-transplant. Nine were returned from patients who were a median of 30 years old and a median of 4 years post-transplant (Table 1). Table 1. Seventy-eight percent of patient and parent respondents reported that quality of life was better after transplant and 89% felt that the transplant improved their physical health (Figure 1). Figure 1. (A) Do you feel quality of life is better now post-transplant than it was pre-transplant? (B) Do you feel that the transplant has been beneficial from a medical perspective? PROMIS Global Health scoring tool revealed 84% of patients had mental health scores within 1 SE of the mean. Only a few mental health diagnoses were self-reported (Figure 2). Figure 2. (A) PROMIS Mental Health Report Scores. (B) Mental health condition diagnosed by a physician. After transplant, there were no self-reported cases of autoimmune disease or malignancy. Three participants were able to conceive children. One respondent used sperm banking; two did not use fertility preservation or treatments. Discussion Our data demonstrate that the majority of patients who undergo allogeneic HSCT for definitive treatment of CGD experience improvements in physical and/or mental health and enjoy an improved quality of life after transplant. Overall, this study supports positive outcomes for patients treated with allogeneic HSCT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it