MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409786585 · doi:10.70962/cis2025abstract.152

Safe Off-Label Use of Icatibant as Treatment for Acute Hereditary Angioedema Attacks in a Pediatric Patient

2025· article· en· W4409786585 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tiffany Truong, Timothy Craig

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Human Immunity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcatibantHereditary angioedemaMedicineDermatologyAngioedemaIntensive care medicineBradykininInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, potentially life-threatening disease characterized by recurrent attacks of subcutaneous and submucosal swelling. Currently, only intravenous (IV) therapies are approved in the USA for treatment of HAE attacks in children younger than 12. IV therapy is difficult for caregivers to administer to young children, and these patients often require care in the emergency department (ED) for administration, delaying resolution. Subcutaneous injection allows earlier therapy, decreasing risk of more serious complications of acute attacks and reducing need for ED-level care. Icatibant is a selective antagonist of the bradykinin B2 receptor and administered subcutaneously. In the European Union (EU) and Canada, it is approved down to the age of 2. Here, we describe a single case of a 6-year-old female with HAE type 1 for whom icatibant was safely used off-label for an acute attack with resolution of her symptoms. Case Description Despite previous success with Berinert for abortion of peripheral attacks, this patient’s family was frustrated with long wait times and care in the ED. Given a sibling’s success with icatibant, review of preexisting literature, and the Canadian package insert, we opted to prescribe this off-label as a rescue using shared-decision making. She was initially given icatibant 0.4 mg/kg for abortive treatment in the ED. Eventually, the patient was approved through her insurance to use icatibant 15 mg SQ for attacks, and lanadelumab was also initiated for maintenance therapy given increasing attack frequency through manufacturer assistance and eventual insurance approval through assistance of a multidisciplinary team. The only adverse event was injection site pain, and her attack frequency decreased. Discussion This case illustrates the potential for safe off-label use of icatibant down to 2 years of age for acute attacks of HAE. Penn State Health has been prescribing and administering icatibant down to 2 years of age despite being off-label, and we hope this work encourages FDA approval and other institutions to make icatibant available as a weight-adjusted dose as an option for abortive treatment until oral rescue medications are available to reduce drug burden in pediatrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Human ImmunitySame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207