Optimization Research of Enterprise Supply Chain Demand Forecasting and Inventory Cost Control Based on Machine Learning Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Market economy is characterized by the uncertainty of supply and demand, so enterprises can realize the optimization of inventory cost control only by reasonably forecasting the demand of supply chain.This paper studies a supply chain demand forecasting method based on machine learning.The factors affecting supply chain demand are collected and analyzed, and the ARMA model, which combines autoregressive model and moving average model, is used to forecast supply chain demand.Then, through the introduction of procurement cost, storage cost and time cost, a multi-level inventory model is established, and the immune genetic algorithm is used to solve the model to find the optimal inventory cost.The experimental results show that the prediction model has good forecasting performance.After using the optimized scheme, the total inventory cost of the enterprise supply chain is reduced by 17.35% and 13.69% respectively.It can be seen that, on the whole, the method in this paper has a good effect of supply chain demand forecasting and cost control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it