Enterprise cost accounting and control based on job costing method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In enterprise cost accounting and control research, traditional activity-based costing (ABC) relies on detailed activity tracking data and complex cost allocation models, which makes data acquisition difficult, has low-cost allocation accuracy, ignores dynamic changes, and has the problem of insufficient flexibility.This paper constructs an improved ABC application framework, builds an activity-driven cost accounting model, analyzes the daily activity data of the enterprise, determines the key factors related to cost, and establishes a mapping relationship between activity and cost.This paper introduces a dynamic adjustment mechanism to adjust the weights and parameters in the cost accounting model in real time according to changes in the external environment and internal operations, thereby improving the flexibility and accuracy of cost accounting.It can integrate the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system with the cost accounting model, integrate the company's financial data, production data and sales data, use information tools to automatically update activity costs, and provide timely feedback to the cost control system; it can closely combine cost accounting and control, monitor and adjust costs in real time during the accounting process, and take timely control measures when abnormalities occur.Experiments show that in terms of cost allocation accuracy, the average SE (Standard Error) of the improved ABC in enterprises with different employee sizes is 2.1, and the average MSE (Mean Squared Error) is about 5.5.It is more stable when processing enterprise data and can better reflect the actual cost allocation.The response time of the improved ABC is 5.7 seconds when the raw material price increases by 25%.It can make adjustments faster, with better flexibility and dynamic adaptability; the experiment proves the effectiveness of this paper in the research of enterprise cost accounting and control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".