Enterprise Supply Chain Management and Information Assurance Mechanism Based on Error Backpropagation Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adapt to the new competitive environment, the supply chain concept and management model of horizontal integration and cooperation between enterprises have begun to rise, and continuously demonstrate enormous competitive strength and superiority.However, the existing enterprise supply chain management (SCM) system has problems of low security, low efficiency, and high management costs.In view of the above problems, this paper studied the enterprise supply chain management and its information assurance mechanism based on the error back propagation algorithm.By analyzing the problems in enterprise supply chain management and introducing error back propagation algorithm as an optimization method, the efficiency and accuracy of the supply chain have been improved.At the same time, corresponding guarantee mechanisms were proposed to address the importance of information security in the enterprise supply chain.The research results indicated that the information leakage rate of the supply chain information protection mechanism based on the error back propagation algorithm was below 3.21%, and the average leakage rate of 20 experiments was 2.654%.For supplier management in enterprise supply chain management systems, the selected users scored the system based on error back propagation algorithm at least 8.84 points, and the average score of 10 users was 8.995 points.Enterprise supply chain management and information assurance mechanism based on error back propagation algorithm can effectively improve the effect of supply chain management and enhance the security of information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".