Research on the Path of Enhancing Teaching Effect of Data Visualization Technology in Civic and Political Education in Colleges and Universities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The field of education is paying more and more attention to the fundamental task of education by establishing morality, and ideological and political education has become a major project in which all the teaching and learning links cooperate with each other and are accomplished in a concerted manner.This study explores the method of organic integration of ideological and political education and teaching and data visualization technology to enhance the effect of ideological and political teaching.Firstly, the method of portrait construction is introduced, combined with the student behavior dataset, and the student behavior data is preprocessed.Using the user portrait construction method as a hub, a gradient boosting decision tree model was used to predict the students' Civics learning performance.The improved K-prototypes clustering algorithm was used to categorize student groups, which facilitated teachers to develop targeted learning strategies.Finally, group portraits and feature labels are extracted from the students to further help teachers accurately determine the types of student groups and carry out personalized teaching.The classroom teaching model in this paper classifies students into four categories with obvious behavioral characteristics, which increases teachers' understanding of students, and the model not only improves students' academic performance in Civics, but also significantly improves students' level of course Civics and increases students' classroom active response rate by 19.625%.The Civics education data visualization technology proposed in this paper reveals the rules of Civics education and improves teachers' work efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".